USPTO serial 86395569
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil Juneja
NEIL JUNEJA GLEAM LAW, PLLC613 19TH AVE E STE 202SEATTLE, WA 98112-4000UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Acetylene regulators; Control valves for regulating the flow of gases and liquids; Flow meters; Leak detectors for gas; Oxygen masks not for medical use; Oxygen regulators; Protective eyewear; Protective gloves for industrial use; Protective head guards for industrial purposes; Safety eyewear; Safety goggles; Safety helmets; Solderers' helmets; Voltage surge protectors; Welding helmets; Welding masks; Welding transformers | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Gas regulators; Industrial scrubbers for removing particulate matter from the air during industrial processing, namely, welding; Pressure regulators for gas installations; Regulating accessories for gas pipes and lines; Regulating accessories for water or gas apparatus and pipes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |