USPTO serial 86395686
THE DISTRICT DETROIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 10, 2019
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
Need help with THE DISTRICT DETROIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Olympia Development of Michigan, LLC
Detroit, MI, US
Other trademarks owned by Olympia Development of Michigan, LLC
Olympia Development of Michigan, LLC
Detroit, MI, US
Other trademarks owned by Olympia Development of Michigan, LLC
Olympia Development of Michigan, LLC
Detroit, MI, US
Other trademarks owned by Olympia Development of Michigan, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joy J. Wildes
Joy J. Wildes Davis+Gilbert LLP1675 Broadway, 31st FloorNew York, NY 10019United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate management services; leasing of real estate | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Real estate development | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, organization of sports competitions and providing sports facilities; entertainment services, namely, the presentation and production of live music concerts and theatrical performances; entertainment services, namely, night clubs; providing mixed-use entertainment facilities, namely, [ providing entertainment facilities for various purposes such as night clubs, karaoke clubs, ] comedy clubs, [ motion picture theaters, ] dinner theaters [ , amusement arcades, virtual reality entertainment facilities, family recreation facilities, museums, health club facilities and casinos; operating motion picture theaters ] ; entertainment in the nature of theater productions, namely, live performance theaters; dinner theaters; amusement arcades; providing virtual reality entertainment facilities; providing family recreation facilities; museums [ ; neighborhood association services, namely, organizing and conducting cultural and educational gatherings, meetings and events in the field of neighborhood issues, and organizing and conducting gathering, meetings, and events in the field of neighborhood issues for social entertainment purposes ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Bar and restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Olympia Development of Michigan, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Olympia Development of Michigan, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Olympia Development of Michigan, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named THE DISTRICT DETROIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2019 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 3, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |