Drawing for THE HEIGHTS AT NORTHRIDGE

USPTO serial 86396833

THE HEIGHTS AT NORTHRIDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE HEIGHTS AT NORTHRIDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James Hurt

James Hurt Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP12275 El Camino Real, Suite 100San Diego, CA 92130United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Providing assistance to senior citizens seeking to determine assisted living facilities appropriate for their needs; Providing assisted living facilities; Providing independent living residences and living facilities; Retirement homesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 31, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 18, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 17, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 17, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 17, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 29, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 4, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 29, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 11, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance