USPTO serial 86397214
HRCI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GULIANO, ROBERT N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HRCI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Human Resource Certification Institute, Inc.
Alexandria, VA
Other trademarks owned by Human Resource Certification Institute, Inc.
Human Resource Certification Institute, Inc.
Alexandria, VA
Other trademarks owned by Human Resource Certification Institute, Inc.
HUMAN RESOURCE CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE SUBSIDIARY LLC
ALEXANDRIA, VA
Other trademarks owned by HUMAN RESOURCE CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE SUBSIDIARY LLC
HUMAN RESOURCE CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE, INC.
ALEXANDRIA, VA
Other trademarks owned by HUMAN RESOURCE CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Price
ANDREW D. PRICE VENABLE LLPP.O. Box 34385Washington, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, study guides and handbooks in the field of human resources management | ACTIVE | May 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Human Resource Certification Institute, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Human Resource Certification Institute, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HUMAN RESOURCE CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE SUBSIDIARY LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HUMAN RESOURCE CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named HRCI
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 29, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 17, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 19, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |