Drawing for ECOPUMP

USPTO serial 86398317

ECOPUMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOPUMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Moore

THOMAS J. MOORE BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 SLATERS LN FL 4ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Compressed air driven ejectors being parts of machines, which have a one-piece nozzle fitting that can be mounted directly on a suction pad, which allow direct installation in gripping tools, which are parts of vacuum lifting machines featuring suction grippers, and which are not for use with electric pumps, electric pumps for water and waste, rotary pumps, sludge pumps, sump pumps, and water pumps for industrial wasteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2016MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 22, 2016ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 21, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 22, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 21, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 18, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 22, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance