USPTO serial 86398405
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
KING OF PRUSSIA, PA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Liel Hollander
LIEL HOLLANDER HOLLANDER LAW, P.C.10 BOND ST STE 420GREAT NECK, NY 11021-2454UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Alimentary pasta; Alimentary paste (pastas and noodles); Bagel chips; Bagel holes; Bagels; Bakery goods; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods; Biscuits and bread; Biscuits, tarts, cakes made with cereals; Bread; Bread bases; Bread rolls; Breakfast cereals; Cakes; Cereal based snack food; Cereal-based snack foods; Combination meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice-based entrees and soup or salad for consumption on or off the premises; Cookies; Cookies and crackers; Croissants; English muffins; Food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers and/or cookies; Frozen breads; Ice cream desserts; Muffins; Packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Pasta; Pasta and noodles; Pasta shells; Pita; Pita bread; Processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; Ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; Rolls; Snack cakes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |