CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SENSPEC

USPTO serial 86399070

SENSPEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSPEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Curtis B. Hamre

CURTIS B. HAMRE HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C.45 South Seventh Street, Suite 2700MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Reagent paper other than for medical purposes; Test paper, chemical; Chemical reagents for non-medical purposesACTIVE—
005Reagent paper for medical purposes; Chemical reagents for medical or veterinary purposesACTIVE—
009Scanners; Computer software for scanners; Structured semi-conductor wafers; Electronic circuitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 29, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 19, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2016IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2016INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Apr 28, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 25, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 25, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 11, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 9, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 7, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 10, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 2, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance