Drawing for DRIVTECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 86399396

DRIVTECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, WILLIAM D
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRIVTECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill J. Ormond

201 East Washington StreetSte. 1200Phoenix, AZ 85004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising, marketing and promotional services for automotive dealershipsACTIVENov 1, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 29, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 28, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 6, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 5, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 5, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 8, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 6, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 28, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 10, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 1, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance