Drawing for BREASTSEQ

USPTO serial 86400586

BREASTSEQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BREASTSEQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Davis

CATHRYN A. BERRYMAN Baker & McKenzie LLP300 East Randolph StreetSuite 5000Chicago, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Medical and scientific research in the field of cancer treatment and diagnosis featuring molecular analysis, gene sequencing and tumor profiling for individual cancers; diagnostic testing in the field of molecular analysis, gene sequencing and tumor profiling for individual cancers, for scientific and clinical research purposesACTIVE—
044Medical testing for diagnostic and treatment purposes in the field of molecular analysis, gene sequencing and tumor profiling for individual cancers; diagnostic testing in the field of molecular analysis, gene sequencing and tumor profiling for individual cancers, for medical diagnostic and treatment purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 26, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 7, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 19, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 19, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 19, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 19, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 12, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 4, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 14, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 11, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 8, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jun 8, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 8, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 23, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 20, 2015NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 21, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 8, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 29, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance