Drawing for ROCK

USPTO serial 86400699

ROCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey F. Gersh

Jeffrey F. Gersh Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP15260 VENTURA BLVD 20th Floor15260 Ventura Blvd., 20th FloorSherman Oaks, CA 91403

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Novelty toy items in the nature of painted objects, namely, round, oblong, and oval objects made of any material, including natural and polished stones, all bearing various designs and symbolsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 17, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 18, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 17, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 26, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance