Drawing for VHOTO

USPTO serial 86401755

VHOTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRINGER, DANIEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VHOTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire

MICHAEL J. BEVILACQUA, ESQUIRE WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORRLLP60 STATE ST STE 25BOSTON, MA 02109-1816UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009mobile device software for processing video to select the photos, video clips and/or audio clips from said video that meet certain criteria; mobile device software for editing photos, video clips and/or audio clipsACTIVE—
042computer services, namely, hosting an online website for enabling users to access, browse, create, edit and share photos, videos and audio over computer networks; computer services, namely, hosting an online website for creating an on-line community for registered users to participate in discussions, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities and engage in social networking; computer services, namely, hosting an online website featuring a digital video and digital photo library; computer services, namely, providing cloud based storage services for data, documents and digital media of others; computer services, namely, providing cloud based computational analysis services for digital video, photo and audio mediaACTIVE—
045On-line social networking servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 13, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 18, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 29, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 16, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance