USPTO serial 86402166
REGUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HISER, CHARLES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REGUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Madurai, Tamil Nadu, IN
Madurai, Tamil Nadu, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Dorisio
ANDREW D DORISIO KING & SCHICKLI PLLC247 N BROADWAYLEXINGTON, KY 40507-1058UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable software for searching emails | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Providing keywords service for websites, namely search engine and website optimization using keywords | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Web-based Email services; providing access to email accounts through web browser and a website; providing access to instant messaging accounts through web browser and a website; SMS services; providing chat services, namely, voice chat services, text chat services, instant messaging services; Mobile mail services, namely, providing mobile phone email, providing access email on mobile phone; Providing telecommunication connections to the Internet or database; Telecommunication services, namely, telecommunication gateway services; providing user access to global computer networks related to games and jobs; Providing internet chat rooms; electronic data transmission services; Cellular phone communication services; Television Telecast services, namely, television broadcasting; Communications by Computer Terminals; communications via fiber optic networks; Providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; Providing user access to global computer networks; providing access to computer database on the global computer network for searching and retrieving information, data, and web sites available on computer networks; E-mail services; Messenger services, namely, instant messaging services; Fax and email services; electronic transmission of messages and images; Electronic mail services | ABANDONED | — |
| 039 | Messenger services | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Spam filtration services for messages; blog services, namely, creating and maintaining blogs for others; non-downloadable software for the searching of an email; providing search engine services featuring the highlighting of keyworded terms | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ramkumar Somasundaram
- Other trademarks owned by Ramkumar Somasundaram
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REGUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |