USPTO serial 86402698
CM MALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CM MALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Cayman, KY
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jie (Lisa) Li
Jie (Lisa) Li Greenberg Traurig, LLP4 Embarcadero Center Suite 3000San Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer antivirus software; computer security and privacy software; computer software for the creation of firewalls; computer software for use in browsing the Internet; computer software for system cleaning and optimization; computer software for developing and operating cloud computer networks and applications; computer software platforms for operating, accessing, and maintaining cloud computing networks; computer applications software for desktop computers, mobile phones, portable media players, handheld computers, wearable electronic devices, namely, software for use in database management and maintenance of electronic data; computer software used for providing search engine services; computer software for use in testing and evaluating the function of mobile devices and computers; computer application software and downloadable software for marketing, processing, tracking, and fulfilling orders, and for providing consumers online ordering, delivery, reservations, ticketing, locating and mapping venues, providing information including prices, compilations, rankings, ratings, reviews, referrals, contact information, and recommendations concerning entertainment venues and events; computer software for tracking and customizing digital content and commerce offerings, and gathering marketing data and information; computer software for optimization and management of online and mobile marketing, advertising, content personalization and product recommendation; software for integrating e-commerce, digital content delivery and social networks; software for personalization of users' e-commerce, on-line shopping, and other digital content delivery experiences; software for delivering personal user comments and recommendations via the Internet; Computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via mobile devices, local and global computer networks; computer software for facilitating and managing merchant-customer communications, and providing payment transaction information; computer software for providing an on-line database in the field of transaction processing to upload transactional data, provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports; computer software for collecting, analyzing and reporting business related data and information, namely, software for creating and reporting of business analytics relating to payment processing, authentication, and tracking; computer software for use in on-line marketplace which provides customers and merchants with links to the retail websites of third-party merchants; software for providing an on-line commercial information directory; software for disseminating advertising and sales information via an on-line electronic communications network; software for providing a searchable on-line advertising guide featuring the goods and services; software for providing online retail store and department store services; software for computerized processing of on-line purchase orders; software for compilation of business information into searchable databases available via a global computer network; software for automated and computerized trading of goods and services provided over a global communication information network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |