USPTO serial 86402732
CM VIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANDERSON, CASSONDRA CR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CM VIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Cayman, KY
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jie (Lisa) Li
Jie (Lisa) Li Greenberg Traurig, LLP4 Embarcadero Center Suite 3000San Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer antivirus software; computer security and privacy software; computer software for the creation of firewalls; computer software for use in browsing the Internet; computer software for system cleaning and optimization; computer software for developing and operating cloud computer networks and applications; computer software platforms for operating, accessing, and maintaining cloud computing networks; computer applications software for desktop computers, mobile phones, portable media players, handheld computers, wearable electronic devices, namely, software for use in database management and maintenance of electronic data; computer software used for providing search engine services; computer software for use in testing and evaluating the function of mobile devices and computers; Computer software for downloading, streaming, broadcasting, displaying, playing, receiving, transmitting, editing, formatting, organizing, storing, creating, and reproducing audio, video, text, and multimedia content and data; Computer software for use in the delivery, distribution and transmission of audio, video, text and multimedia content in connection with computers, television, music players, video players, media players, mobile electronic devices, and wearable electronic devices; Computer software for formatting and converting content, text, visual, audiovisual works, data, files and electronic works into a format compatible with portable and wearable electronic devices and computers; downloadable audio, video, text, and multimedia files featuring entertainment and advertisement; Downloadable electronic content, namely, video clips featuring entertainment and advertisement, sound clips featuring entertainment and advertisement, electronic wallpaper, ring tones, and computer software for the personalization of mobile devices, distributed via a global computer network and wireless device; computer software for tracking and customizing digital content and commerce offerings, and gathering marketing data and information in the field of entertainment and advertisement; software for creating, viewing, manipulating, editing, managing, optimizing, organizing, storing, transferring, synchronizing, exchanging and posting digital photographs, images, texts, and videos in the field of social media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |