Drawing for SCHIQUE

USPTO serial 86403010

SCHIQUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCHIQUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katja Loeffelholz

KATJA LOEFFELHOLZ DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY1455 1ST ST STE 301NAPA, CA 94559-2822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Blush; Eyebrow pencils; Eyeliners; Eyeshadows; Foundation; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Lipsticks; Mascaras; TonersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 27, 2017IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2017INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Feb 6, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 6, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 10, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 10, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 25, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2015ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 13, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 21, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 20, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance