USPTO serial 86403748
PCI COMPLIANCE SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4934307Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2016
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PCI COMPLIANCE SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian M Davis
Brian M Davis VLP LAW GROUP LLP5960 FAIRVIEW RDSUITE 400CHARLOTTE, NC 28210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, developing training materials for others in the field of general information security, secure credit card handling and security procedures, payment card industry standard and security policy and compliance procedures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 16, 2014 |
| 042 | Software as a service featuring software to manage payment card industry regulatory compliance requirements; developing financial information security strategies and policies for others; computer services, namely, monitoring, testing, analyzing, and reporting on the internet traffic control and content control of the web sites of others; computer technical support services, namely, service desk services for IT infrastructure, operating systems, database systems, and web applications; technical support, namely, monitoring technological functions of computer network systems; online security services, namely, providing security and anonymity for electronically transmitted credit card transactions; testing of security systems; software as a service featuring computer software that enables users to fulfill payment card industry security standards reporting requirements and manage, monitor and generate information and reports regarding merchant requirements in accordance with the payment card industry security standards; testing, analysis and evaluation of computer security for compliance with payment card industry data security standards; testing, analysis and evaluation of the services and management systems in the nature of computer servers, point-of-sale credit card systems, computer laptops, computer desktops and general network equipment, namely, firewalls and routers of others for the purpose of certification; computer system testing and analysis services provided to businesses relating to the identification and elimination of computer system and computer network security vulnerabilities which facilitate access and attack of the system or network by unauthorized individuals; testing, analysis, and evaluation of merchant payment services to determine compliance with industry standards in the fields of credit card and debit card processing, data storage, and hardware and software requirements relating thereto; computer software consultancy; computer security consultation, namely, consultation concerning risk assessments and risk management strategies; computer security consultation, namely, consultation concerning payment card industry regulatory compliance; software as a service featuring software for file system security; computer consulting in the nature of computer information security and compliance assessments, computer network security policy development, all in the field of computer information security; technical support, namely, monitoring technical functions of computer network systems for unauthorized access and unauthorized activity for the benefit of others; computer services, namely, collection, analysis and display of information and data using general system log data from computer servers, point-of-sale credit card systems, computer laptops, computer desktops and general network equipment, namely, firewalls and routers generated by software applications, servers, network devices, security devices, firewalls and remote infrastructure; computer services, namely, collection, analysis and display of information regarding process events, registry events and network events on a network endpoint that may be indicators of compromise or malicious activity for the benefit of others, namely, attempts to scan a network, identify computer software or configuration vulnerabilities; compromise a computer in an unauthorized fashion, gain access to sensitive data and or steal sensitive data; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use as an enterprise mobility platform for security, management, collaboration and application services for mobile devices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 16, 2014 |
| 045 | Monitoring the computer systems of others for data security purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 16, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 1, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |