Drawing for WAXING WINDOW

USPTO serial 86403895

WAXING WINDOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WAXING WINDOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan Ward

JONATHAN WARD MOHR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW SOLUTIONS, PC522 SW 5TH AVE STE 1390PORTLAND, OR 97204-2134UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Cloth cover for the face that is place around the hair line of the head to protect the skin of the forehead, ears, side of face, and neck while waxingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 3, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2015CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2015SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 5, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 28, 2015IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 28, 2015EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 28, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 3, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 21, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 9, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2014TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Oct 9, 2014PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance