Drawing for ISHOCK

USPTO serial 86406200

ISHOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISHOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary P. Topolosky

4031 BROWNSVILLE RDPITTSBURGH, PA 15227UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Carrying cases, holders, protective cases and stands featuring power supply connectors, adaptors, speakers and battery charging devices, specially adapted for use with handheld digital electronic devices, namely, cell phones, mp3 playersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 24, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 22, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 17, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 16, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 16, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 16, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 16, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 16, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 15, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 4, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Oct 3, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 29, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance