USPTO serial 86407688
ROVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUNT, LEE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Franklin Park, IL
Franklin Park, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin Lampel
JUSTIN LAMPEL LAMPEL & ASSOCIATES PC555 SKOKIE BLVD SUITE 500NORTHBROOK, IL 60062-2845UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Automotive engine oils; Automotive greases; Automotive lubricants; Engine oils; Hydraulic oils; Lubricating greases; Lubricating oil for motor vehicle engines; Lubricating oils and greases; Lubricating oils for automotive parts; Lubrication grease for vehicles; Mineral motor fuel; Motor fuel; Motor oil; Motor oils; Non-chemical engine treatments and additives for engine oils, gasoline and diesel fuels, transmission fluids and cooling systems; Two cycle engine oil | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |