Drawing for SIMPLY BETTER TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 86409296

SIMPLY BETTER TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLY BETTER TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer A. Visintine

JENNIFER A. VISINTINE THOMPSON COBURN LLP505 N 7TH ST STE 2700SAINT LOUIS, MO 63101-1693UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in database management and document production for real estate professionalsACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLYโ€”
Oct 27, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Oct 26, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
Oct 19, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Oct 19, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
May 18, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
May 18, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
May 18, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Oct 27, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Oct 19, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Oct 19, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIPโ€”
May 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
May 20, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
May 19, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALโ€”
Apr 19, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Apr 19, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Jun 29, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Jun 29, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Jun 29, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 24, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILEDโ€”
Mar 24, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILEDโ€”
Feb 18, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Feb 16, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Jan 28, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Jan 28, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDโ€”
Jan 28, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
Jan 28, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
Jan 28, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENโ€”
Jan 24, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Oct 7, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTEREDโ€”
Oct 2, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance