USPTO serial 86409371
UBIQUITOUS RELEVANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UBIQUITOUS RELEVANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, ON, CA
Toronto, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yuri Chumak
Yuri Chumak Chumak & Company LLPSuite 2011201 Dundas St. E.TORONTO, ONTARIO, M5H2Y4Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software applications for consumers for the purpose of engaging in predictive and context-aware environments and experiences, generating and collecting data, and providing zone-oriented user notifications and services to geo-fenced areas; providing temporary use of non-downloadable commercial cloud-based software applications for the purpose of engaging in predictive and context-aware environments and experiences, generating and collecting data, and providing zone-oriented user notifications and services to geo-fenced areas; providing temporary use of non-downloadable context-aware software applications for consumers for the purpose of engaging in environments and experiences, generating and collecting data, and providing zone-oriented user notifications and services to geo-fenced areas; providing temporary use of non-downloadable commercial context-aware software applications for the purpose of engaging in environments and experiences, generating and collecting data, and providing zone-oriented user notifications and services to geo-fenced areas; Design development and implementation of cloud-based and context aware mobile solution software applications for the consumer and commercial sectors, namely, mobile applications comprised of a software as a service platform for delivery and management of intelligent mobile applications; Design, development and implementation platform for delivery and management of intelligent mobile applications; Design, development and implementation of cloud-based and context aware mobile solution software applications for the consumer and commercial sectors, namely, zone oriented applications that provide user notifications and services to geo-fenced areas through drag-and-drop functionality; Providing the temporary use of online non-downloadable software applications for the aggregation of user analytics in the nature of pattern and activity recognition; IT consulting services in the nature of aggregating software data regarding pattern and activity recognition; Providing the temporary use of online non-downloadable software of capturing data and location which uses artificial intelligence, context-aware computing, social network analytics and crowd sourcing principles to obtain mobile device responses to situational factors | ACTIVE | May 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2019 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 14, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |