Drawing for BLUE EDGE LAB

USPTO serial 86411299

BLUE EDGE LAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUE EDGE LAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ann K. Ford

ANN K. FORD DLA PIPER LLP (US)500 8TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, software that facilitates the secure delivery of information in the fields of government affairs, legislation, policies, mandates, standards, intellectual property, technology transactions, biotechnology, corporate news, market intelligence, cyber, internet and network security, and government and industry sector regulations; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for use in securely delivering current business data on client companies, industry market information and business practice areas; Computer application software for use on computers, tablets and smart devices in the nature of smart phones, portable media players, handheld computing devices, tablet PCs, laptops and desktops, to securely download digitized content and which allows the user to securely view, annotate, search and link to proprietary research materials; computer software that facilitates the management of projects and transactions in the fields of government affairs, legislation, policies, mandates, standards, intellectual property, technology transactions, biotechnology, corporate news, market intelligence, cyber, internet and network security, and government and industry sector regulationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 19, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 19, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 8, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 20, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 16, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 23, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 22, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 16, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 11, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 11, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 11, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 23, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 17, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 17, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 16, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 16, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 17, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance