USPTO serial 86411608
OUR SPECIALTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OUR SPECIALTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian E. Turung
BRIAN E. TURUNG FAY SHARPE LLP1228 EUCLID AVECLEVELAND, OH 44115-1834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Barbecue poultry; barbecue pork; barbecue beef; smoked beef; smoked pork; smoked poultry; smoked sausage; stuffed pasta shells; meatballs; Italian style meatballs; turkey meatballs; nut-based food bars; fruit-based food bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bakery products; bakery desserts; frozen, fresh or packed bakery products, namely, rolls, pizza crusts, pizza, calzones, cream puffs, chocolate puffs, pies, petits fours, biscuits, cakes, cheesecakes, mousse cake, sponge cakes, angle food cakes, cookies, brownies, pastries, cinnamon rolls, donuts, buns, cupcakes, croissants, breads, flat breads, naan breads, bread sticks, scones, eclairs, pastries, puff pastries, bagels, pancakes, waffles, crepes, dumplings, baklava, biscotti, bread pudding, danish pastry, fudge, sticky buns, strudel, tarts, tortes, english muffins, rusks, bear claws, rice cake, cake pops, ice-cream cakes, wafers, chocolate-based ready to eat food bars, crackers, fruit cobblers, fruit turnovers, pitas, tortillas, taco shells, and muffins; puddings; ice cream cake; ice cream cupcakes; frozen yogurt cakes; barbecue sauce; barbecue rubs; flan; crème brulee; custard; parfaits; pudding; mousse; dulce de leche; fruit pies; fruit cakes; ice cream; fruit sorbet; cereal-based food bars; grain-based food bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rich Products Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Rich Products Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named OUR SPECIALTY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |