USPTO serial 86412578
CBX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, WILLIAM D
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CBX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam S. Weiss
ADAM S. WEISS POLSINELLI PC150 N. Riverside Plaza, Suite 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | Providing information, professional services, and advice in connection with bitcoin technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |