USPTO serial 86412980
A FRESH NEW LOOK IN DIGITAL PRINTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A FRESH NEW LOOK IN DIGITAL PRINTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzanne K. Ketler
SUZANNE K. KETLER ROETZEL & ANDRESS222 S MAIN ST STE 400AKRON, OH 44308-1500UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Fabrics, namely, acrylic fabrics; acetate fabrics; alpaca woolen cloth; cotton and cotton blend fabrics; polyester and polyester blend fabrics; linen and linen blend fabrics; batik dyed woven fabrics; calico fabrics; cotton canvas fabrics; cashmere fabrics; chambray cotton yarn fabrics; cotton and wool challis fabrics; charmuse cotton fabrics; checkered, homespun and tweed wool and cotton fabrics; chintz cotton fabrics; circular knitted fabrics; corduroy fabrics; crepe fabrics; damask fabrics; denim fabrics; rayon dobby fabrics; dotted Swiss cotton and silk fabrics; drapery fabrics; duck fabrics made of cotton; flannel fabrics; felt fabrics; fleece fabrics; gauze fabrics; georgette knitted fabrics; gingham cotton fabrics; interfacing cotton fabrics; cotton interlock fabrics; silk jacquard fabrics; jersey fabrics; knitted fabrics; lacquer print cotton fabrics; moiré cotton fabrics; muslin fabrics; nonwoven textile fabrics; oxford fabrics of cotton, linen and wool; percale fabrics; pliees cotton fabrics; plush cotton fabrics; cotton poplin fabrics; printed fabrics in the nature of printed fabric panels and printed cotton fabrics; pad dye cotton and wool fabrics; piece dye cotton and wool fabrics; quilting cotton fabrics; rayon fabrics; laminated cotton fabrics; sateen fabrics; satin fabrics; seersucker wool fabrics; cotton sheeting fabrics in the nature of cotton fabrics used in the manufacture of sheets; silk fabrics; taffeta fabrics; terry cloth fabrics; toile fabrics in the nature of linen; tricot fabrics; twill weave cotton and wool fabrics; velour fabrics; velvet fabrics; velveteen fabrics; voile fabrics; wrap knitted fabrics; yacht cotton cloth; fabrics for textile use; fabrics for the manufacture of scrubs, blankets, shirts, robes, jeans, tablecloths, bedding, quilts, hats, tote bags, purses, pocket books, bed covers, slacks, bundles in the nature of bundle wrapping cloths, fat quarters in the nature of quilts; sewing kits comprised of precut fabrics for textile use | ACTIVE | Dec 11, 2015 |
| 035 | Retail store services and on-line retail store services featuring fabrics and digitally printed fabrics | ACTIVE | Dec 11, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hello Fabric, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Hello Fabric, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named A FRESH NEW LOOK IN DIGITAL PRINTING
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |