USPTO serial 86415792
EARTHLINK SECURE STOREFRONT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EARTHLINK SECURE STOREFRONT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dustin Mauck
Dustin Mauck RegitzMauck PLLC1700 Pacific AvenueSuite 2610Dallas, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, developing training materials for others in the field of general information security, secure credit card handling and security procedures, payment card industry standard and security policy and compliance procedures | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service featuring software to manage payment card industry regulatory compliance requirements; developing financial information security strategies and policies for others; computer services, namely, monitoring, testing, analyzing, and reporting on the internet traffic control and content control of the web sites of others; computer technical support services, namely, service desk services for IT infrastructure, operating systems, database systems, and web applications; technical support, namely, monitoring technological functions of computer network systems; online security services, namely, providing security and anonymity for electronically transmitted credit card transactions; testing of security systems; software as a service featuring computer software that enables users to fulfill payment card industry security standards reporting requirements and manage, monitor and generate information and reports regarding merchant requirements in accordance with the payment card industry security standards; testing, analysis and evaluation of computer security for compliance with payment card industry data security standards; testing, analysis and evaluation of the services and management systems in the nature of evaluating computer servers, point-of-sale credit card systems, computer laptops, computer desktops and general network equipment, namely, firewalls and routers of others for the purpose of certification; computer system testing and analysis services provided to businesses relating to the identification and elimination of computer system and computer network security vulnerabilities which facilitate access and attack of the system or network by unauthorized individuals; testing, analysis, and evaluation of merchant payment services to determine compliance with industry standards in the fields of credit card and debit card processing, data storage, and hardware and software requirements relating thereto; computer software consultancy; computer security consultation, namely, consultation concerning risk assessments and risk management strategies; computer security consultation, namely, consultation concerning payment card industry regulatory compliance; software as a service featuring software for file system security; computer consulting in the nature of computer information security and compliance assessments, computer network security policy development, all in the field of computer information security; technical support, namely, monitoring technical functions of computer network systems for unauthorized access and unauthorized activity for the benefit of others; computer services, namely, collection, analysis and display of information and data using system log data from computer servers, point-of-sale credit card systems, computer laptops, computer desktops and general network equipment, namely, firewalls and routers and systems log data generated by software applications, servers, network devices, security devices, firewalls and remote infrastructure; computer services, namely, collection, analysis and display of information regarding process events, registry events and network events on a network endpoint that may be indicators of compromise or malicious activity for the benefit of others, namely, attempts to scan a network, identify computer software or configuration vulnerabilities; compromise a computer in an unauthorized fashion, gain access to sensitive data and or steal sensitive data; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use as an enterprise mobility platform for security, management, collaboration and application services for mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring the computer systems of others for data security purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EarthLink, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EarthLink, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named EARTHLINK SECURE STOREFRONT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 10, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 24, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |