USPTO serial 86417064
AGENT 99
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AGENT 99?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie A. Greenberg
JULIE A. GREENBERG GIFFORD KRASS SPRINKLE ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI2701 TROY CENTER DR STE 330TROY, MI 48084-4741UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation; travel ticket reservation service; arranging and coordinating travel arrangements for individuals and groups, namely, destination stays, honeymoons and family vacations | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for hotels and temporary accommodations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |