Drawing for SAUVAGE

USPTO serial 86418382

SAUVAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MITTLER, ROBIN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAUVAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bret J. Danow

BRET J. DANOW KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP575 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-2511UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Flavored brewed malt beverageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 18, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 30, 2016ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 15, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 27, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 6, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 5, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 14, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 14, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 29, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2014RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Nov 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance