USPTO serial 86418958
UROPULSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UROPULSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J. Peckham
DEBORAH J PECKHAM BURNS & LEVINSON LLLP125 SUMMER ST STE 800BOSTON, MA 02110-1624UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus and instruments and parts therefor, using acoustic pressure wave or vibration technology for treating musculoskeletal disorders, nervous system, cardiovascular, urologic and wound conditions in the fields of orthopedics, sports medicine, pain management, rehabilitation, plastic surgery, dermatology, aesthetic medicine, urology, cardiology and wound healing; medical apparatus and instruments and parts therefor, using acoustic pressure wave or vibration technology for the diagnosis of musculoskeletal disorders, nervous system, cardiovascular, urologic and wound conditions in the fields of orthopedics, sports medicine, pain management, rehabilitation, plastic surgery, dermatology, aesthetic medicine, urology, cardiology and wound healing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |