Drawing for CICADA

USPTO serial 86419269

CICADA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CICADA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Wolf

DOUGLAS R. WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVE FL 23BOSTON, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective eyewear and accessories therefore, namely, goggles and related lenses, visors with attached lenses and related lenses, eyewear cases, and lens cases; protective eyewear for firefightersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance