USPTO serial 86419326
TECHRADAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECHRADAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Don Reeve
DON REEVE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INVESTMENT LAW GROUP3150 DE LA CRUZ BLVD STE 206SANTA CLARA, CA 95054-2407UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consultation services in the fields of commercial enterprise, intellectual property and technology, namely, providing search services for information related to intellectual property rights and technology via online services, application service provider services (ASP), and/or software as a service (Saas); electronically collecting, reporting, and analyzing intellectual property rights and technology; mapping and visualizing electronically the relationships of existing intellectual property and technology to each other and the search criteria | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer, technical and research services, namely, providing research, analysis, reporting, consultation and technical information related to intellectual property rights and technology; Application service provider services (ASP), namely, providing a computer database program for information related to intellectual property rights and technology; Online services, namely, providing search services for information related to intellectual property rights and technology; Software as a service (Saas), namely, providing software allowing for searching of intellectual property rights and technology; electronically renting access time for computer database program; providing online consultation services related to intellectual property and technology; providing online services for renting computer / server usage; providing online services for renting electronic storage medium; electronically collecting, reporting, and analyzing intellectual property rights and technology; mapping and visualizing electronically the relationships of existing intellectual property and technology to each other and the search criteria | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |