Drawing for BRCACARE

USPTO serial 86420590

BRCACARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRCACARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Siu K. Lo, JD, PhD

SIU K LO GENESIS INVESTMENT PROPERTIES LLC2439 KUSER ROADHAMILTON, NJ 08690UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Genetic testing for medical purposes; Medical screening; Providing health information, specifically a Comprehensive BRCA Analysis, an Ashkenazi Jewish 3-site Mutation Analysis, an Ashkenazi Jewish 3-site Mutation Analysis with reflex, BRCA1: Specific Site Analysis, and BRCA2: Specific Site AnalysisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 6, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 6, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 22, 2016EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 26, 2016RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jun 30, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 20, 2016MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
May 13, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 13, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 12, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 29, 2016RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
Mar 29, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 29, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 14, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 5, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 5, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 4, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 4, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 4, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance