Drawing for SOLLINK

USPTO serial 86420623

SOLLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Paul Davis

JOHN PAUL DAVIS WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLP441 VINE ST STE 2700CINCINNATI, OH 45202-2814UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic devices for electricity generation and usage monitoring, controlling, and communication, namely, communications hubs and energy meters; electronic devices and computer software that allow the sharing and transmission of data and information between devices for the purpose of facilitating electricity generation and usage monitoring, controlling, and communication, namely, communications hubs and energy metersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2018TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Apr 20, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 20, 2018OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 31, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 1, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 19, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 24, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 20, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 15, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 10, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 29, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance