Drawing for VEGAS PARTY

USPTO serial 86420725

VEGAS PARTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VEGAS PARTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauri S. Thompson

LAURI S THOMPSON GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP3773 HOWARD HUGHES PKWYSTE 400NLAS VEGAS, NV 89169

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded music CD's and DVD's; downloadable music filesACTIVEAug 29, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 13, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 13, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 3, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 23, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 1, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 1, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 1, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 1, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2017CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 23, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 1, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 1, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 26, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 24, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 7, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 28, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance