USPTO serial 86421754
BECAUSE PEOPLE MATTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BECAUSE PEOPLE MATTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew Saunders
MATTHEW SAUNDERS SAUNDERS & SILVERSTEIN LLP14 CEDAR ST STE 224AMESBURY, MA 01913-1831UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services, namely, consultation concerning managed services in the fields of aerospace, intelligence, defense, engineering, information technology, information security, pharmaceuticals, and biotechnology; Business consulting services, namely, consultation concerning managed services in the fields of information security, cybersecurity, information technology (IT) infrastructure, information technology (IT) support, software application development, software application testing, business analytics, project management, product management, quality assurance, network administration, network architecture, data warehousing, content management systems, systems engineering, systems analysis, and systems integration; Business consulting services, namely, consultation concerning managed services in the fields of clinical study management, clinical study site monitoring and management, clinical programming, biostatistics, drug safety, data management, and regulatory affairs for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries; Business consulting services, namely, consultation concerning managed services in the fields of electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, hardware engineering, and software engineering; Business consulting services, namely, consultation concerning managed services for defense contractors; Information technology (IT) managed services; Managed services, namely, management of insourced and contingent labor in the fields of aerospace, intelligence, defense, engineering, information technology, information security, pharmaceuticals, and biotechnology; Managed services, namely, management of insourced and contingent labor in the fields of information technology (IT) infrastructure, information technology (IT) support, software application development, software application testing, business analytics, project management, product management, quality assurance, network administration, network architecture, data warehousing, content management systems, systems engineering, systems analysis, and systems integration; Managed services, namely, management of insourced and contingent labor in the fields of information security and cybersecurity, namely, information assurance, intrusion detection, incident response, malware analysis, reverse engineering, forensics analysis, network architecture, security engineering, systems administration and engineering, and network administration and engineering; Managed services, namely, management of insourced and contingent labor in the fields of clinical study management, clinical study site monitoring and management, clinical programming, biostatistics, drug safety, data management, and regulatory affairs for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries; Managed services, namely, management of insourced and contingent labor in the fields of electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, hardware engineering, and software engineering; Managed services, namely, management of insourced and contingent labor for defense contractors | ABANDONED | Oct 13, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 25, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |