Drawing for SOUND CITY

USPTO serial 86424310

SOUND CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOUND CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B. Mizrahi

Mark B. Mizrahi Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP11400 West Olympic Blvd.9th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90064

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Musical instrumentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 23, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
May 22, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 22, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 17, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 17, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 17, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 17, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 16, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 16, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 16, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 16, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 16, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 17, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 27, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 27, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 27, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 27, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
May 17, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 17, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 12, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 16, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 22, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 21, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 9, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 9, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 22, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 28, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance