USPTO serial 86424807
INFINITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INFINITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam D. Resnick
ADAM D. RESNICK MOSAIC LEGAL GROUP, PLLC5185 MACARTHUR BLVD NW STE 350WASHINGTON, DC 20016-3353UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Digital mobile messaging services, namely, instant messaging, enterprise messaging, text messaging, short messaging services (SMS), and multimedia messaging services (MMS) via global telecommunications networks; telecommunications gateway services; telecommunications services, namely, wireless electronic transmission of text, picture, video, and audio messages or data to and from mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Information technology consulting services; computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology systems of others; consulting in the field of IT project management; technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; product development and engineering services for others; product engineering services; providing enterprise mobility solutions, namely, developing customized hardware and software for others; computer services, namely, remote management of electronic messaging systems of others; Solution as a service featuring software, hardware, and necessary resources for use in providing an end-to-end solution to improve efficiency, reduce costs, streamline processes in the areas of compliance, regulatory, finance, healthcare, and technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |