Drawing for AT ABRASIVE TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 86426800

AT ABRASIVE TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5010536Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 2, 2016
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with AT ABRASIVE TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,700

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey J. Nein

Jeffrey J. Nein Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter Co., L.P.A.65 East State StreetSuite 1800COLUMBUS, OH 43215

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial diamond abrasive grinding and cutting tools, namely, wheels mandrels, laps, saws, drills, trueing and dressing kits comprised of one truing tool and one dressing stick for use with truing and dressing machinesACTIVEFeb 7, 1974
010Dental instruments, namely, diamond dental burs designed for use in the friction grip high-speed handpiece, namely amalgam remover, composite finishers, depth cutters, end cutters, interproximal trimmer, operative tools and wheels, friction grip tools in the shape of barrel, cone, crown cut, cylinders, flame, football, gingival curettage, pear, round, taper, torpedo, truncated bud; dental tools for laboratory use designed to fit the laboratory handpiece in the shape of cones, cylinders, flames, rounds, tapes and wheels; diamond strips, discs, trimming wheels and polishing paste designed for operatory and laboratory use, and associated accessories, namely, dental dressing and cleaning stones and dental instrument holdersACTIVEAug 13, 1971

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2022NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2022C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 3, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 24, 2022E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 2, 2021REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 17, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance