Drawing for DISTALMOTION

USPTO serial 86427878

DISTALMOTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISTALMOTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julian D. Forman

JULIAN D FORMAN JD PATENT701 West Georgia Street #1500Vancouver, BC, V7Y1C6CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus and instruments for use in minimally invasive surgery; namely, mechanical teleoperated instruments for use in abdominal, urological and gynecological minimally invasive surgeryACTIVE—
044Medical information; Medical servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 14, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 14, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 4, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 13, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 31, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 17, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 17, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 17, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 17, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance