USPTO serial 86428020
Serial No. 86428020
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 86428020?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Kornfield
SUSAN M. KORNFIELD Bodman PLC201 S. Division Street, Suite 400Ann Arbor, MI 48104-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation; Business development services, namely, providing start-up support for businesses of others; Providing business consulting to freelancers, start-ups, existing businesses and non-profit organizations; Providing office support staff services for businesses; Business management consulting, namely, providing quality management services for other businesses; Business networking and general professional referral services for other businesses, namely, promoting the goods and services of others by passing business leads and referrals; Incubation services, namely, provision of work space, testing or production facilities, meeting rooms, and warehouses for other companies to assist in business operations; Business development and business advisory services; Providing business management information in connection with consulting and advisory services in the field of strategic planning; Business administration services, namely, providing support for businesses of others; Providing business lead generation and matching services, namely, providing assistance in securing dilutive and non-dilutive funding for other businesses, providing assistance in securing financing for other companies, and provision of strategic introductions for equity and debt financing to other companies; Business venture development and formation consulting services; Business services, namely, matching potential private investors with entrepreneurs needing funding | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, business fundraising for others; Venture capital services, namely, providing financing to other companies; Financial services, namely, providing dilutive and non-dilutive funding, and equity and debt financing, to other companies; Financial services, namely, providing financing for other companies; Leasing of office space to other companies | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Prototype fabrication of products for others; Custom manufacturing of products for others in the field of electronics, opto-mechanical, opto-electrical, optical, and mechanical devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Innovation consulting services, namely, advising others in the areas of product development; Product design, product manufacturing, and product testing; Product development for others; Engineering consulting services in connection with developing and manufacturing product prototypes and end products; Providing quality management, namely, quality evaluation and analysis, quality assurance, and quality control, in the field of aerospace, medicine, food, energy, electronics, communications, transportation, informatics, finance, entertainment, and sports; Testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others for the purpose of certification | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Michigan Aerospace Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Michigan Aerospace Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |