Drawing for DRONE ACADEMY X

USPTO serial 86428218

DRONE ACADEMY X

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRONE ACADEMY X?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter H. Rachman

PETER H. RACHMAN DSLRPROS, INC.3500 NE 12 AVE.3500 NE 12th AveOAKLAND PARK, FL 33334

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012DronesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2015PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Aug 10, 2015PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 7, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Aug 7, 2015APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 5, 2015PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 29, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance