Drawing for SOPHIA & KATE

USPTO serial 86428354

SOPHIA & KATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOPHIA & KATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl S. Sawyer, Jr.

KARL S SAWYER JR NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP100 N TRYON STBANK OF AMERICA CORPORATE CTR 42ND FLCHARLOTTE, NC 28202-4000

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014jewelryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 30, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 30, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 24, 2016EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 10, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 11, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 8, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 1, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 1, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 11, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 9, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 1, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 1, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 1, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 28, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance