USPTO serial 86428432
GRENADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRENADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Coventry, Warwickshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzanne K. Ketler
SUZANNE K KETLER ROETZEL & ANDRESS222 S MAIN STAKRON, OH 44308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Gymnastic apparatus; gymnastic and sporting articles and equipment, namely, benches for gymnastic use, resistance machines, bench presses, weightlifting machines; balls for use in sports; exercise and fitness apparatus, equipment, and machines, namely, weights, treadmills, rowing machines, stair stepping machines, resistance machines, bench presses, weight lifting machines, stationary cycles; straps used for yoga and other fitness activities and for carrying a yoga mat; vibrating apparatus used in fitness and exercise programs to stimulate muscles and increase strength and physical performance; sports exercise equipment, machines, and accessories, namely, lower body alignment apparatus, roller slides in the nature of ab wheels; exercise equipment and machines, namely, resistance machines, chest pulls, rowing machines, treadmills, weights, inflatable balls, medicine balls, exercise bikes, ab wheels, sit up bars, bench presses, weightlifting machines; hand exercisers not for therapeutic purposes; gymnasium equipment, namely, weights, treadmills, rowing machines, stair stepping machines, resistance machines, bench presses, weightlifting machines, stationary cycles; straps used for yoga and other fitness activities and for carrying a yoga mat; vibrating apparatus used in fitness and exercise programs to stimulate muscles and increase strength and physical performance; skipping ropes; weight lifting belts, weight lifting gloves, athletic sporting goods in the nature of athletic wrist support straps and weight lifting belts, and kettle bells; weight lifting apparatus and equipment namely, dumb-bells, leg weights, weight lifting bars, wrist and ankle weights; weights for use in physical activities namely, dumb-bells, leg weights, wrist and ankle weights; computer game consoles for use with an external display screen or monitor; portable computer game consoles for recreational game playing; protective, water-resistant, and water-proof bags, covers, cases, carriers, and holders specially adapted for use in relation to computer game consoles, portable computer game consoles; structural parts and fittings for all the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 26, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |