USPTO serial 86428744
PURETEK BI-FUNCTIONAL FILTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4884024Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 12, 2016
- Examiner
- HINES, REGINA C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PURETEK BI-FUNCTIONAL FILTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kaohsiung City, TW
Kaohsiung City, TW
Kaohsiung City, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kurt Rohlfs
KURT ROHLFS CHERNOFF VILHAUER, LLP601 SW 2ND AVE STE 1600PORTLAND, OR 97204-3157UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Catalytic converters; Catalytic converters for motors and engines; Catalytic convertor units for vehicle exhausts; Catalytic converters for the exhaust gases of internal combustion engines; Anti-pollution devices for motors, machines and engines; Blowing machines for exhaustion of dust, gases etc; Cartridges for filtering machines; Dust exhausting installations for cleaning purposes; Dust removing installations for cleaning purposes; Filtering machines; Filters as parts of machines or engines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Air filters; Air conditioning filters; Filters for cleaning air; Air cleaning filters as parts of cleaning machines or installations; Air filters for use as dust extractors in industrial processes; air filters for use as dust arrestants in industrial processes; Air filtering installations; Air driers; Filters for air conditioning; Filters as parts of household, retail, storage or industrial installations; Gas Scrubbing apparatus; Pollution control filters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clean Air Technology Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Clean Air Technology Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Clean Air Technology Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named PURETEK BI-FUNCTIONAL FILTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2015 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |