Drawing for PROTOCOL

USPTO serial 86429108

PROTOCOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTOCOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel Hopkinson

6445 Montessouri St.Las Vegas, NV 89113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Work benches, saw horsesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2017PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 7, 2017PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 13, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 1, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 1, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2016UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Oct 31, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2016NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 6, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 22, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 24, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 24, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 6, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 22, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance