Drawing for HENDO

USPTO serial 86429188

HENDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DENNIS, SETH OWEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HENDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William P. Ramey III

William P. Ramey III Ramey & Schwaller, LLP5020 Montrose Blvd., Ste. 750Houston, TX 77006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Hovering vehicles and hovering apparatuses for locomotion by electromagnetic levitation, namely, hover boards, hovering platforms, remote-controlled hovering platforms, unmanned hovering platforms, unmanned drones, unmanned remote controlled drones, and remote controlled unmanned hovering platforms; hover hobby kits for constructing hovering vehicles and hovering apparatuses for locomotion by electromagnetic levitation comprising hover engines, hover surface material, mounting structure for engines, and engine controllers, sold as a unitACTIVEOct 21, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 17, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 21, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 27, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 20, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2016EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2016IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2016INCSITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE—
Mar 9, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 4, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 27, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 4, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 22, 2015ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 17, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance