Drawing for NAOMI

USPTO serial 86429964

NAOMI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5115021Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 3, 2017
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with NAOMI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauren A. Dienes-Middlen

Lauren A. Dienes-Middlen WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, INC.1241 EAST MAIN STREETSTAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, wrestling exhibitions and performances by professional wrestlers and entertainers rendered live and through broadcast media including television and radio, and via the internet or commercial online service; Providing information in the fields of sports and entertainment via an online community portal; Providing a website in the field of sports entertainment [ ; Fan club services; Organizing and staging social entertainment events with fan club members; Providing online newsletters in the fields of sports entertainment; Online journals, namely, blogs, in the fields of sports entertainment ]ACTIVESep 7, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 20, 2023ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 15, 2023ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 1, 2023NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2023C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 1, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 3, 2023E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2022REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 2, 2016SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2016CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 22, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 7, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 7, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 7, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 7, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 23, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 29, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 9, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 8, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 7, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance