USPTO serial 86430055
SWET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SWET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alexandria, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew H Swyers
MATTHEW H SWYERS THE TRADEMARK COMPANY344 MAPLE AVENUE WEST #151VIENNA, VA 22180UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Conducting fitness classes; Consulting services in the fields of fitness and exercise; Organizing, arranging, and conducting cycling events; Physical fitness studio services, namely, providing exercise classes, body sculpting classes, and group fitness classes; Providing a web site featuring information on exercise and fitness; Providing a website featuring information on exercise and fitness; Providing fitness and exercise facilities; Providing information on physical exercise | ACTIVE | Aug 14, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |