Drawing for QUANTUX

USPTO serial 86431296

QUANTUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUANTUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

Raj Abhyanker LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.446 E Southern Ave.Tempe, AZ 85282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing online non-downloadable trading user interface software for use in making investment decisions and conducting financial portfolio management; non-downloadable software that provides users the capability to create and manage rules that govern execution of financial transactions; non-downloadable software providing templates of predefined rules that govern execution of financial transactionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 27, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 15, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 15, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 14, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 19, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 29, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance