USPTO serial 86432134
TULLE & CHANTILLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4883318Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 2016
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TULLE & CHANTILLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Weiguo Zhou
WEIGUO ZHOU ANOVA LAW GROUP, PLLC21315 GENTRY DR STE 150STERLING, VA 20166-8502UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Chantilly lace wedding albums | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2013 |
| 020 | Tulle and Chantilly lace cake decorations; household decor and garden ornaments made primarily of tulle and Chantilly lace and also including beads | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2013 |
| 025 | Tulle and Chantilly lace bridesmaid dresses; Tulle and Chantilly lace wedding dresses; Tulle and Chantilly lace wedding gowns | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2013 |
| 026 | Tulle and Chantilly lace hair ornaments; Tulle and Chantilly lace ornaments for the hair | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2013 |
| 042 | Dress design services including dresses made of Tulle and Chantilly lace; dress designing including dresses made of tulle and Chantilly lace | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nanjing Walland Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Nanjing Walland Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TULLE & CHANTILLY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 1, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |